Jack Knighton is an employee of PRG Consulting. He has been called for jury duty. One of PRG’s clients is Renar Corporation. Renar is the defendant in the case for which Jack has been called for the jury panel. The attorney for the plaintiff who is suing Renar: a. could have Jack struck from the panel for cause. b. cannot have Jack struck just because his company has the defendant as a client. c. has no recourse because the jury is a wild card in litigation. d. none of the above
Solution 1
Answer:
a. could have Jack struck from the panel for cause.
Explanation:
Due to conflict of interests, there could be the removal of Jack from the panel. The issue of conflict of interests could lead to a wrong decision because Jack will be distracted. He would want a situation that will make his company gain rather than a situation that justice would be served. Therefore, option a is correct.
📚 Related Questions
Answer:
Explanation:
Although it has been attempted to overturn the ruling in the Helling case, I would suppose that these attempts have been unsuccessful because the ruling was in favor of a higher standard of care than what was deemed appropriate by for the ophthalmologists. One might argue that the ruling has remained in place because holding the defendants liable was, in a way, a step towards checking the medical profession’s privilege to set it’s own standards. I feel as though legislature has probably not seen fit to reinforce it because the original ruling remains valid in that a doctor can follow all of the standards of care, and still be liable.
Common Law comes from the English Law.
Explanation:
- Common Law is also known as "judge made law" or "judicial precedent."
- Common laws are those that are derived from the decisions taken by the judiciary or other tribunals.
- This practice of law originated in the courts of the Kings of England. Since it was common to all the courts of the English Kings, it came to be known as the common law.
- Presently, one-third of the world follows or comes under the practices of common law.
- Currently, this law derived from the English law forms the fundamental principle in most legal systems of the world like US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
Answer: b. NIMBYs
Explanation:
NIMBY is actually an acronym for the word "not in my back yard"). Nimby occurs when residents oppose specific placement of land usages using nuisance theories and local zoning laws.
In some cases however, the oppositions posed by these NIMBYs can be trashed and silenced through a constitutional process and making the NIMBYs know the usefulness of the proposed development in such areas.
The name given to this group is called Nimbys.
Answer:
The answer is b. NIMBYs
Explanation:
“NIMBYs” (NIMBY means “not in my back yard”) is the name given to people who oppose the establishment or location of structures or objects on lands around their neighborhood because they consider it to be a nuisance, or unpleasant; however, the same people support the establishment or location of the structures or objects elsewhere, away from their neighborhood.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The Supreme Court has different principles used in different cases. This is also based on the severity of the case and the jurisdiction. The principles are properly structured to ensure that each crime is proportional to its punishment. The principles have been checked and properly approved. Thus, the answer is true.
Age, or if the intercours becomes violent.
Explanation: If the person who is under the age of 18 is the one penetrating inside the young girl voilently, then that would be the oral copulation that would be illegal. And also with oral sex.
Answer:
The answer is: Enslaved persons clause.
Explanation:
Article IV, Section 2 states that it is wrong for any state to discriminate against citizens who originate from other states; in addition to this, Article IV, Section 2 states that when a citizen from one state is enslaved or a fugitive who is alleged to have committed a crime in another state (or second state), the second state is expected to return the citizen back to the state where they committed the crime.
Answer:
B) Enslaved Persons Clause.
Explanation:
correct on edge
Answer:
all of the above
Explanation:
Forum non conveniens talks about the discretionary power that allows a court to dismiss a case brought before it when there seems to be another court or forum that is in a better position to handle the case than the court where the case was first brought into.
This can be triggered either by the sued party or by the law court and the party that initiates the lawsuit can re-file his or her case in those identified appropriate forum or courts. This doctrine applies between courts in different countries and between courts in different jurisdictions in the same country.
Answer:
none of the above
Explanation:
During closing arguments, both parties involved in the case are given between 20 – 60 minutes to come up and forceful argue whatever cases they have. They use this opportunity to see if they can persuade the jury that their opponent in the case is either liable or they themselves are should not be liable.
This argument is not presented by the judge nor by the plaintiff’s attorney only, rather by both parties. After the closing argument, then the jury instructions by the judge follow, the arguments in itself are not part of the instructions made by the jury.
Answer:
carry civil and criminal penalties.
Explanation:
Violations of the Clean Air Act carry civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day for each violation of the Act. Corporations connected with an explosion in Texas, paid a total of $3.5 million dollars for criminal violations of the Clean Air Act.
Answer: A
Explanation: personal experience
Answer:
none of the above
Explanation:
Different sites like the processing plants and manufacturing sites in the United States were seen to be largely contaminated by hazardous wastes that are either not properly managed or indiscriminately dumped and left out in the open.
Such practices happened in 1970s when the people learnt how bad these sites can be by posing risks to the environment and to their health. This prompted the congress to establish the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) in 1980 which gave rise to the superfund.
Any party that contaminates similar areas would clean it up by themselves or reimburse the government the money for cleanups. These monies are then given to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by the superfund, together with the authority they need for them to come in and cleanup contaminated sites.