Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly. Which plan offers a tax-free education? A_________Plan is a plan that offers a tax-free education, even upon withdrawal. However, the use of the money is limited and can only be used for education expenses.
Solution 1
Answer:
529
Explanation:
A 529 plan is a plan to encourage savings for future education expenses. The money saved in a 529 plan is not subject to taxation as long as it will be used for education purposes.
Parents, grandparents, or guardians can open 529 savings account for a child, who will be named as the beneficiary. The contributor of funds to the account may be eligible for a state tax deduction for contributing to a 529 plan. The gains on the accounts are exempt from tax if they are to be used on education expenses.
📚 Related Questions
They took $5,000 off
All of his 3 credit cards currently have a balance, as he has had trouble paying off his card each month he has dumped.
What is a credit card?
A credit card is said to be a type of plastic money that allows an individual to purchase goods on credit and pay back the amount later on some specified rate of interest being charged on it.
In order to avoid excessive spending, one should keep in mind that if a credit card debt is left unpaid at the end of the credit limit, interest will be imposed on the remaining balance.
In the event that you fail to pay your credit card bill at all, you will probably be assessed a late fee, miss your majesty period, and be required to pay interest at a penalty rate. A good credit score can be improved and maintained by keeping your balance at or below 30% of your credit limit.
Learn more about credit cards, here:
#SPJ5
Answer:
then he dumped
Explanation:
Answer:
Signs of the boom are everywhere. Over 500 business-ethics courses are currently taught on American campuses; fully 90% of the nation’s business schools now provide some kind of training in the area. There are more than 25 textbooks in the field and 3 academic journals dedicated to the topic. At least 16 business-ethics research centers are now in operation, and endowed chairs in business ethics have been established at Georgetown, Virginia, Minnesota, and a number of other prominent business schools.
And yet, I suspect that the field of business ethics is largely irrelevant for most managers. It’s not that they are hostile to the idea of business ethics. Recent surveys suggest that over three-quarters of America’s major corporations are actively trying to build ethics into their organizations. Managers would welcome concrete assistance with primarily two kinds of ethical challenges: first, identifying ethical courses of action in difficult gray-area situations (the kind that Harvard Business School Lecturer Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. has described as “not issues of right versus wrong,” but “conflicts of right versus right”); and, second, navigating those situations where the right course is clear, but real-world competitive and institutional pressures lead even well-intentioned managers astray.
The problem is that the discipline of business ethics has yet to provide much concrete help to managers in either of these areas, and even business ethicists sense it. One can’t help but notice how often articles in the field lament a lack of direction or poor fit with the real ethical problems of real managers. “Business Ethics: Where Are We Going?” asks one title. “Is There No Such Thing as Business Ethics?” wonders another. My personal favorite puts it wryly, “Business Ethics: Like Nailing Jello to a Wall.”
Explanation:
Answer:Signs of the boom are everywhere. Over 500 business-ethics courses are currently taught on American campuses; fully 90% of the nation’s business schools now provide some kind of training in the area. There are more than 25 textbooks in the field and 3 academic journals dedicated to the topic. At least 16 business-ethics research centers are now in operation, and endowed chairs in business ethics have been established at Georgetown, Virginia, Minnesota, and a number of other prominent business schools.
And yet, I suspect that the field of business ethics is largely irrelevant for most managers. It’s not that they are hostile to the idea of business ethics. Recent surveys suggest that over three-quarters of America’s major corporations are actively trying to build ethics into their organizations. Managers would welcome concrete assistance with primarily two kinds of ethical challenges: first, identifying ethical courses of action in difficult gray-area situations (the kind that Harvard Business School Lecturer Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. has described as “not issues of right versus wrong,” but “conflicts of right versus right”); and, second, navigating those situations where the right course is clear, but real-world competitive and institutional pressures lead even well-intentioned managers astray.
The problem is that the discipline of business ethics has yet to provide much concrete help to managers in either of these areas, and even business ethicists sense it. One can’t help but notice how often articles in the field lament a lack of direction or poor fit with the real ethical problems of real managers. “Business Ethics: Where Are We Going?” asks one title. “Is There No Such Thing as Business Ethics?” wonders another. My personal favorite puts it wryly, “Business Ethics: Like Nailing Jello to a Wall.”
What is the matter with business ethics? And more important, what can be done to make it right? The texts reviewed here shed light on both questions. They point to the gulf that exists between academic business ethics and professional management and suggest that business ethicists themselves may be largely responsible for this gap.
Far too many business ethicists have occupied a rarified moral high ground, removed from the real concerns and real-world problems of the vast majority of managers. They have been too preoccupied with absolutist notions of what it means for managers to be ethical, with overly general criticisms of capitalism as an economic system, with dense and abstract theorizing, and with prescriptions that apply only remotely to managerial practice. Such trends are all the more disappointing in contrast to the success that ethicists in other professions—medicine, law, and government—have had in providing real and welcome assistance to their practitioners.
Does this mean that managers can safely dismiss the enterprise of business ethics? No. In the past year or two, a number of prominent business ethicists have been taking stock of their field from within. Much like managers trying to reengineer their companies’ business processes, they have called for fundamental changes in the way the enterprise of business ethics is conducted. And they are offering some promising new approaches of value to both academic business ethicists and professional managers.
What follows, then, is a guide to business ethics for perplexed managers: why it seems so irrelevant to their problems and how it can be made more useful in the future.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Answer:
$50
Explanation:
The real rate of interest is the nominal interest rate adjusted for inflation.
I.e., real rate = nominal rate - inflation rate
real rate = 8% - 3%
=5%
The real growth of $1000 will be
=5/100 x 1000
=$50
Real growth will be by $50
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
A paycheck deduction is a compulsory deduction imposed on all employees by the federal or state government. For a paycheck deduction, the employee has no option but to pay. The amount payable is a percentage base on the gross pay. The federal or state government set the percentage to be deducted.
From the List paycheck deduction are
- Medicare
- social security
Employee incentives are benefits offered to employees by their employer. Incentives motivate employees to work hard, save for retirement, or promote employees' welfare.
Incentives in the list are
- 401(k)
- Life insurance
Answer:
Employee incentive: 401 (k), life insurance
Paycheck deduction: Social security, Medicare, FICA
Explanation:
Hope it helps
The type of insurance that renters would buy would most likely dependent on the renters' preference considering their level of income or their favourite banks. So, the owners of the house wouldn't put this on the agreement because it might turn the potential renters away.
Answer:
private property rights
Explanation:
Private property rights are the rights that means the legal ownership of the resources and how it is used. In various type of countries, the property rights are exercised in order to hold, delegate, rent or sell the property also it is a feature of the capitalism
So as per the given situation the private property rights is the answer
Answer:
C. word choice
Explanation:
i got it right on edg 2021
Answer:
Explanation:
so u want the definition of what?